[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8 |
Date: |
Tue, 27 May 2008 10:22:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 01:33:21PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> address@hidden writes:
> >> > | [...] XML processors MUST be able to use this character to
> >> > | differentiate between UTF-8 and UTF-16 encoded documents.
> >> > `----
> >
> > ...and how are the XML processors supposed to achieve that? Is there a
> > second variant of BOM, indicating UTF-8?
>
> The encoding of BOM (incidentally, isn't this name for it obsolete?) is
> different in utf-8 and utf-16.
Stephen noticed as well: this was just the missing piece in my head :)
(BTW: we might redefine the acronym to stand for "Bad Old Microsoft"?).
Regards
- -- tomás
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIO8TdBcgs9XrR2kYRAvqtAJ9jf4XT5nAgAeeNGjgi9T0f27BkewCfX4HQ
velBGbYVITaFqHsgGRhFlnA=
=88Eg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/17