Re: Global keymaps

[Stefan Monnier]

>>> A name like `ctl-x-n-map' is not descriptive indeed, but at least it
>>> doesn't limit the keymap to one particular functionality, and keeps
>>> it open for further unrelated bindings.  Since we already very tight
>>> on available keys, who knows what commands we will need in future on
>>> these keymaps especially if they will have unrelated but good mnemonics.
>> 
>> Hopefully, by the time we bump into this problem, we'll have multiple
>> inheritance for keymaps, so we can just define ctl-x-n-map to be a map
>> that inherits from narrow-map and from the-other-n-thing-map.

> I'd like to ascertain what could be done now.  In addition
> to register and rectangle commands, `C-x r' also includes
> keybindings for the bookmark package. So a keymap name like
> `register-rectangle-bookmark-and-anything-more-map' clearly
> is not an option.  So we need to separate "physical" maps
> (bound to physical key sequences) and "logical" maps (like
> narrow-map and abbrev-map where keys are grouped by functionality).

> The package bookmark.el already defines a map `bookmark-map',
> but it is not bound to any key by default.  It also adds
> three keys to the `C-x r' prefix as:

>   ;;;###autoload (define-key ctl-x-map "rb" 'bookmark-jump)
>   ;;;###autoload (define-key ctl-x-map "rm" 'bookmark-set)
>   ;;;###autoload (define-key ctl-x-map "rl" 'bookmark-bmenu-list)

> So it seems inevitable to create a new map `ctl-x-r-map' and bind
> these key to it as:

>   ;;;###autoload (define-key ctl-x-r-map "b" 'bookmark-jump)
>   ;;;###autoload (define-key ctl-x-r-map "m" 'bookmark-set)
>   ;;;###autoload (define-key ctl-x-r-map "l" 'bookmark-bmenu-list)

> Alternatively, when multiple inheritance will be available, a keymap
> with these three keys could be named as `bookmark-mixin-map' to be
> merged with register and rectangle maps in ctl-x-r-map.

Yes,


        Stefan