[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed]
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed] |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:19:01 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: Sven Joachim <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:11:21 -0400
>
> >> I think Rmail should be fixed to not send replies to Resent-* addresses.
> > Maybe, but it's kinda scary: this code has been in Rmail since October
> > 1996.
>
> That's probably why it needs to be updated: the RFC is pretty clear.
> Can you take care of it?
Yes, but I won't have time until 4 weeks from now. If it can wait,
then fine.
Btw, why does the bug tracker need these headers? Fixing the above
won't help those who use older Emacsen, so if using the headers is not
really necessary, perhaps we should lose them nonetheless?
- address@hidden: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed], Eli Zaretskii, 2008/06/28
- Re: address@hidden: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed], Don Armstrong, 2008/06/28
- Re: address@hidden: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed], Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/28
- Re: address@hidden: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed], Eli Zaretskii, 2008/06/28
- Re: address@hidden: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed], Sven Joachim, 2008/06/29
- Re: address@hidden: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed], Eli Zaretskii, 2008/06/29
- Re: address@hidden: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed], Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/29
- Re: address@hidden: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed],
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: address@hidden: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed], Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/29
- Re: address@hidden: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed], Don Armstrong, 2008/06/29
- Re: address@hidden: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed], Eli Zaretskii, 2008/06/29
- Re: address@hidden: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed], Don Armstrong, 2008/06/30