[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem

From: Vinicius Jose Latorre
Subject: Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:19:30 -0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv: Gecko/20080702 SeaMonkey/1.1.11

David Reitter wrote:
On 22 Jul 2008, at 21:53, Vinicius Jose Latorre wrote:

I would still want the pilcrow to be used by default and the more (s/t)ame colors for the face.
But that may well be the default for whitespace in general.

Well, you can change the whitespace-newline and whitespace-display-mappings settings in your ~/.emacs file.

... so we don't have to set sensible defaults?

BTW, I also prefer the pilcrow.

The default has to be sensible, and this is quite possibly different for the full-blown whitespace-mode and for this show-newlines-mode.

Since unicode is no problem, I would suggest to use the pilcrow for both modes, and stick to no background color and grey foreground for the show-newlines-mode.

Well, the current defaults are sensible.

There was a discussion about whitespace settings before whitespace was accepted as part of Emacs.

When I said that I also prefer pilcrow, I was expressing my preference, but this is not the consensus about these settings.

Anyway, anyone can change these settings in ~/.emacs file to reflect personal preferences.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]