[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: line-move-visual never set to nil?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: line-move-visual never set to nil? |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:46:29 +0900 |
"Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <address@hidden> writes:
> I think this case is special. The special thing is the relation between
> the visual move and the buffer point. That relation changes according to
> something that is rather unrelated with the buffer contents but can
> easily be changed by the user. That makes the relation very volatile.
Not really, given that (1) window-width changes quite rarely,
and (2) most macros are used immediately (in the same buffer/window) and
then discarded (or rather, forgotten about).
Anyway, what you're suggesting seems every bit as bad, or worse, than
the problem it's purporting to solve -- without, as far as I can see,
any actual evidence that there _is_ a problem (have we gotten any bug
reports?).
-Miles
--
Freebooter, n. A conqueror in a small way of business, whose annexations lack
of the sanctifying merit of magnitude.
- Re: line-move-visual never set to nil?, (continued)
- Re: line-move-visual never set to nil?, Miles Bader, 2008/07/31
- Re: line-move-visual never set to nil?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/07/31
- Re: line-move-visual never set to nil?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/07/31
- Re: line-move-visual never set to nil?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/07/31
- Re: line-move-visual never set to nil?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/07/31
- Re: line-move-visual never set to nil?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/07/31
- Re: line-move-visual never set to nil?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/07/31
- Re: line-move-visual never set to nil?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/07/31
- Re: line-move-visual never set to nil?, Miles Bader, 2008/07/31
- Re: line-move-visual never set to nil?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/07/31
- Re: line-move-visual never set to nil?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: line-move-visual never set to nil?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/07/31