Re: Removing MULTI_KBOARD

[Jason Rumney]

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

>> You have handwaved that.  Can you please actually explain why you think that?
>> I have explained it is not a problem.
> 
> How it is not a problem, if the MSDOS port does not support
> MULTI_KBOARD?  I must have missed the explanation, please repeat it.

If anyone is going to get the MSDOS port working again, then the effort
in getting it working with MULTI_KBOARD is going to be similar to or
less than the work required to get the rest of post-multi-tty Emacs
working without MULTI_KBOARD. The reason W32 and Mac now use
MULTI_KBOARD is that the multi-tty changes basically forced it. The
changes were minor compared with what else needs doing to revive the
MSDOS port after the unicode and multi-tty merges.