[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Improving X selection?
From: |
Frank Schmitt |
Subject: |
Re: Improving X selection? |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:06:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
David Hansen <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:15:25 -0400 Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
>>> Please ignore this if it's already been hammered to death, but what about
>>> using C-Insert/Shift-Insert for the clipboard?
>>
>> That would make a lot of sense to me,
>
> Shift-Insert is kind of quasi standard to paste the *selection* on X11.
> This would make emacs behavior even more "non standard". I don't care
> much, just wanted to note that.
I do care much. I use Shift-Insert to paste selection and Control+Insert
to set selection all the time. If the behavior of those keys was
changed, I'd be really p. off.
--
Have you ever considered how much text can fit in eighty columns? Given that a
signature typically contains up to four lines of text, this space allows you to
attach a tremendous amount of valuable information to your messages. Seize the
opportunity and don't waste your signature on bullshit that nobody cares about.
- Re: Improving X selection?, René Kyllingstad, 2008/08/18
- Re: Improving X selection?, David Hansen, 2008/08/18
- Re: Improving X selection?,
Frank Schmitt <=
- Re: Improving X selection?, Juri Linkov, 2008/08/25
- Re: Improving X selection?, Frank Schmitt, 2008/08/28
- Re: Improving X selection?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/08/28
- Re: Improving X selection?, Frank Schmitt, 2008/08/28
- Re: Improving X selection?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/08/28
- Re: Improving X selection?, David Hansen, 2008/08/29
- Re: Improving X selection?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/08/30
- Re: Improving X selection?, David Hansen, 2008/08/31
Re: Improving X selection?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/08/20