[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32?
From: |
Lennart Borgman (gmail) |
Subject: |
Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32? |
Date: |
Sun, 31 Aug 2008 05:49:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 00:40:03 +0200, Lennart Borgman (gmail)
> <address@hidden> said:
>
>> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
>>> You can't assume that a GNU/Linux graphical environment has anything
>>> whatsoever to do with freedesktop.org. At debconf earlier this
>>> month, I raely saw anyone using the default GNOME/KDE environments --
>>> and I personally use fvwm as a window manager, so there is no
>>> trashcan -- thank goodness.
>
>> Maybe it will soon be safe to think that the important GUI
>> environments do have a trash can? (With a possibility to turn it off
>> perhaps.)
>
> I am not at all sure that is a safe assumption. My phone does
> not have a trash can. Indeed, none of the graphical user interfaces I
> have used in about 20 years of computing has _ever_ featured a
> trashcan, and I am not so sure I want to assume the future is
> necessarily different.
I am not sure that mean that the important GUI environments will not
have trash cans.
>> And maybe it is a waste of time to develop too many GUI environments?
>
> Indeed. X10 was perhaps a mistake to go away from.
No idea. And it looks unrelated to the number of GUI environments in the
sense I used it.
>> Maybe it uses resources not only from those doing and using the extra
>> GUI environments but also from all people trying to coordinate? And
>> then there are all misunderstandings, miscommunications, discussions,
>> extra development outside to cooperate (but that might on the other
>> hand raise the need for standard interfaces).
>
> Nod. Diversity is bad. Conformity should be the goal. We shall
> all be assimilated.
Maybe that is a good way to solve conflicts is some cases. But I prefer
thinking over possibilities and consequences.
> manoj
- Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32?, (continued)
- Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/08/30
- Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32?, Taylor Venable, 2008/08/30
- Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/08/30
- Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32?, Manoj Srivastava, 2008/08/30
- Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/08/30
- Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32?, Manoj Srivastava, 2008/08/30
- Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32?,
Lennart Borgman (gmail) <=
- Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/08/30
- Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32?, Manoj Srivastava, 2008/08/30
- Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/08/31
- Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/08/31
- Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/08/31
- Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/08/31
- Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/08/31
- Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/08/31
- Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/08/31
- Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/08/31