[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rmail-mbox branch
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: Rmail-mbox branch |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:45:01 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
In article <address@hidden>, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> > MIME media-type text bodies may use Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit,
> > which would allow you to save the predecoded text body. But who
> > cares? Nobody sends multimegabyte text/plain messages; decoding per
> > display is not an efficiency problem.
> Indeed, decoding upon display is not a problem. The problem that's new
> for Pmail is that Rmail allows the user to edit a message, so Pmail will
> need to be able to re-encode a displayed message.
Isn't it possible to use some of Gnus' functionality to compose a
MIME-correct mail?
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, (continued)
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/09/08
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/09/09
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/09/10
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Paul Michael Reilly, 2008/09/10
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, tomas, 2008/09/10
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Stefan Monnier, 2008/09/10
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/09/10
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/09/10
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Stefan Monnier, 2008/09/03
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Paul Michael Reilly, 2008/09/03
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Stefan Monnier, 2008/09/04
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/09/03
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Paul Michael Reilly, 2008/09/04
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/09/01
Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Paul Michael Reilly, 2008/09/01
Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Paul Michael Reilly, 2008/09/01