[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Frame size changes
From: |
Lennart Borgman (gmail) |
Subject: |
Re: Frame size changes |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Oct 2008 23:37:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
Chong Yidong wrote:
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> If all you need is a flag saying that Emacs is being initialized, why
>> does it have to bear the value of current-time? why not just some
>> simple predicate? What am I missing?
>
> before-init-time and after-init-time have already been introduced in
> Emacs 23; see NEWS. The former is used for the new function
> emacs-uptime, the latter I'm unsure about.
The documentation for before-init-time is a bit unclear. Exactly when is
it set?
> Since these variables already exist, my feeling is that it's better to
> use them rather than to come up with a new flag saying that Emacs is
> being initialized.
>
>
>
- Re: Frame size changes, (continued)
- Re: Frame size changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/10/06
- Re: Frame size changes, Miles Bader, 2008/10/06
- Re: Frame size changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/10/06
- Re: Frame size changes, Miles Bader, 2008/10/06
- Re: Frame size changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/10/06
- Re: Frame size changes, Chong Yidong, 2008/10/05
- Re: Frame size changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/05
- Re: Frame size changes, Chong Yidong, 2008/10/05
- Re: Frame size changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/05
- Re: Frame size changes, Chong Yidong, 2008/10/05
- Re: Frame size changes,
Lennart Borgman (gmail) <=
- Re: Frame size changes, Jan Djärv, 2008/10/05