[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Word boundary

From: Kenichi Handa
Subject: Re: Word boundary
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:27:53 +0900
User-agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)

In article <address@hidden>, Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Normally word breaking does not require breaking between
>>> different scripts. However, adding that capability may be
>>> useful in combination with other extensions of word
>>> segmentation. For example, ...
> >
> > So maybe we should have a user option to enable that, but I think it
> > should be off by default.

> What would the practical effect of that be?  Would it break filling in 
> Japanese?

I think no.  Filling is related to line-breaking, and it
should be treated differently from word-breaking.

Kenichi Handa

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]