[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:09:06 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> Maybe simpler would be to build this table as we do now, then print it
> into a file. Then the "dump" doesn't need to build the table, it can
> just read it from the file.
Handa-san, could you comment on this?
Suppose we have a char-table on file that has the correct precomputed
values for Vchar_unify_table. At which point should Emacs load it? In
place of mule-conf.el in loadup.el? Or would we need to rewrite
mule-conf.el?
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge,
Chong Yidong <=
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Kenichi Handa, 2008/11/04
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Stefan Monnier, 2008/11/05
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Kenichi Handa, 2008/11/06
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Stefan Monnier, 2008/11/07
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Chong Yidong, 2008/11/07
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/11/08
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/11/08
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/11/09
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/11/09
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Stefan Monnier, 2008/11/09