[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:44:27 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> First try it for a month with an open mind. Your reaction is
> out of proportion of the actual impact of this change.
I think everyone agrees that it's a useful feature. There are lots of
features that I personally use, which are not enabled by default for
various good reasons. Similarly, people have pointed out good reasons
not to make this particular feature the default (usage patterns for
which it badly non-optimal, keyboard macros, Tramp,...).
Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Ted Zlatanov, 2008/11/21
Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2008/11/22
Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Juri Linkov, 2008/11/23
Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Miles Bader, 2008/11/23
Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Juri Linkov, 2008/11/23
Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Chong Yidong, 2008/11/23
Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Stefan Monnier, 2008/11/23
Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Chong Yidong, 2008/11/24
Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Stefan Monnier, 2008/11/24
Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, mail, 2008/11/24
Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Miles Bader, 2008/11/24