Re: hash-table-{to, from}-alist

[David De La Harpe Golden]

Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:

>  > I'm OK with that format and it seems pretty good,
>
> Good.  I would be very annoyed if we had to support an alternative
> syntax.

[I think I misunderstood xemacs in my last post, not a user of it], so:

"#s(hash-table ...)" with round brackets or
"#s<hash-table ...>" with angle brackets ?

Checking xemacs lisp ref and thread posts, looks like round brackets are 
consistent with xemacs. Not that it's a major change, just that Ted's
patch used <>  (I realise now that all participants in the thread before 
I chimed in cluelessly may simply have taken it as understood that would 
be changed later, sorry...)