[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug in server-start
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: bug in server-start |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:42:50 +0100 |
> Why don't you explain what part of what I wrote was unclear?
The part where you consider that
Server "server" is already running
(while talking about server.el) is confusing but apparently you don't
consider confusing
Could not start daemon "server"
if passed --daemon=server; or, now that I think of it,
Could not start daemon "daemon"
if passed --daemon=daemon.
As for the "Most users won't know, nor care about that", diagnostic
messages usually contain relevant information, that the user is free
to ignore. We're not talking of several screenfuls of data, just
server-name (which the user would benefit of knowing about).
Juanma
- Re: bug in server-start, (continued)
- Re: bug in server-start, Stefan Monnier, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Ulrich Mueller, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16