[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time val
From: |
Chetan Pandya |
Subject: |
Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:44:45 -0800 (PST) |
I build with gcc version 3.4.5 so I don't know if there are other compiler
differences, but I found that changing the format to
(format-time-string "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M" start)
in proced.el:proced-format-start made it better.
I still have a number of questions about proced and related changes, but I
haven't looked at it carefully yet.
Chetan
--- On Fri, 1/2/09, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time
> values of system-process-attributes
> To: "dhruva" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Friday, January 2, 2009, 2:33 PM
> > Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 10:29:59 +0530
> > From: dhruva <address@hidden>
> > Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> >
> > I notice process started in 2008 have the year and 00:00
> > in the start time. Maybe, it is a separate issue.
> > Ex:
> > dhruva 1400 0.0 1.1 10:21 00:00 emacs.exe
> > dhruva 2476 0.0 0.1 10:20 00:00 cmd.exe
> > dhruva 2340 0.0 2.7 08:50 00:00 opera.exe
> > dhruva 4252 0.0 1.4 2008 00:01 procexp.exe
> > dhruva 2956 0.0 0.6 2008 00:00 BTSTAC~1.EXE
> > dhruva 1912 0.0 0.2 2008 00:00 DLG.exe
>
> If you mean the column after START, the one whose header is TIME, then
> that's not the start time, it's the sum of UTIME and STIME. I think
> these processes simply used up less than 1 sec of utime+stime
> combined. I see such processes as well, but others, which started in
> 2008, have non-zero TIME. Here's a couple of examples
> from my system:
>
> USER GROUP PID START TIME UTIME STIME ETIME COMMAND
> SYSTEM SYSTEM 392 2008 25:03 19:35 05:27 2-10:08:41 avgrsx.exe
> SYSTEM SYSTEM 8049 2008 01:46 00:12 01:34 2-10:09:06 services.exe
> SYSTEM SYSTEM 8162 2008 00:12 00:03 00:09 2-10:09:06 lsass.exe
>
> > Anyway, I will continue to explore this to the best of my abilities.
>
> Thank you.
Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/01/01
- Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/01
- Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/01/02
- Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/03
- Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/01/03
- Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/01/03
- Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/03
- Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/01/03
- Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/03
- Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/03