Re: Functions in kill-emacs-hook aren't run if emacs gets killed with SIGTERM

[Jason Rumney]

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> On balance, I would leave things as they are, i.e. don't run
> kill-emacs-hook when we get SIGTERM.  After all, we are being killed,
> so only the minimum necessary cleanup should be in order.
>   

Another case for not running kill-emacs-hook for SIGTERM is that some 
elisp packages seem to get themselves into inconsistent states (semantic 
is terrible for this) where they throw errors from kill-emacs-hook, so 
the user is forced to kill emacs using SIGTERM. Changing SIGTERM to also 
run kill-emacs-hook would mean only SIGKILL can kill emacs in these 
circumstances.