[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Change in rmail-reply
From: |
Richard M Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Change in rmail-reply |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:10:44 -0500 |
The RFC is clear, but it seems to be clearly wrong. If John Doe sends
a message to you, and you resend it to me, and I do "reply to all", it
seems clear that my reply should by default go to you.
And if you resent it to emacs-devel as well as to me, it seems clear
that "reply to all" should include emacs-devel by default.
Can anyone present an argument in support of what the RFC says?
- Change in rmail-reply, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/26
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Glenn Morris, 2009/01/26
- Re: Change in rmail-reply,
Richard M Stallman <=
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Don Armstrong, 2009/01/27
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/27
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/27
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2009/01/27
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/29
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/29
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/01/29
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/30
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/01/30
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/30