[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??
From: |
Don Armstrong |
Subject: |
Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail?? |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:18:37 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, 02 Feb 2009, Glenn Morris wrote:
> Glenn Morris wrote:
>
> > I think that should instead be address@hidden
> > Otherwise bug reports and notifications about rmail are going to start
> > appearing on emacs-devel rather than bug-gnu-emacs.
> [...]
> > Since we assign bugs to both the emacs _and_ the rmail package, does
> > this mean we will start getting two copies of things?
>
> I see that both of the above are true. Messages from the control
> server about rmail are now cc'd to both emacs-devel and bug-gnu-emacs.
> This is not what we want to happen.
I've set it to address@hidden again. You folks need to figure
out what you actually want to happen first; if you don't understand
the consequences, ask questions.
Don Armstrong
--
Three little words. (In descending order of importance.)
I
love
you
-- hugh macleod http://www.gapingvoid.com/graphics/batch35.php
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, (continued)
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/02/01
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/01
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Don Armstrong, 2009/02/01
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Glenn Morris, 2009/02/01
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Glenn Morris, 2009/02/02
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??,
Don Armstrong <=
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/02
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/02
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/02
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/02
Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Richard M Stallman, 2009/02/01
Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/02