[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32 |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:03:04 +0200 |
> From: =?windows-1252?Q?=D3scar_Fuentes?= <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 04:53:49 +0100
>
> Jason Rumney <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I get the same error, using MinGW binutils on emacs.exe that I've
> > built myself. It only happens with emacs.exe, so it is probably
> > something in the dumping process confuses strip. My strip --version
> > is:
> >
> > GNU strip 2.17.50 20060824
> >
> > If anyone has strip.exe working with emacs.exe, could you post your
> > strip version here for comparison.
>
> 2.18.50.20080109 *FAILS* too.
As does
GNU strip 2.15.91 20040904
I filed a bug report for this problem (I agree with Jason that
something in our dumping process confuses `strip').
I think this problem should be fixed before Emacs 23.1 is released.
- Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, (continued)
- Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/27
- Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/02/27
- Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, David Robinow, 2009/02/27
- Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, Jason Rumney, 2009/02/28
- Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/28
- Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, Jason Rumney, 2009/02/27
- Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, Óscar Fuentes, 2009/02/27
- Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, Lennart Borgman, 2009/02/27
Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, Chetan Pandya, 2009/02/27