[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fontset/font change
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: fontset/font change |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:10:04 +0900 |
In article <address@hidden>, Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:
> Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
>>> It seems a little cleaner to have nil specify the current fontset rather
>>> than fontset-default, but only a little. In your estimation, is there a
>>> significant amount of outside code (e.g. user customizations) that rely
>>> on the old behavior?
> >
> > I don't think so because I don't here any complaints about
> > it after I changed t for the default long ago in
> > emacs-unicode-2 branch. And even since the merge of about
> > one year ago, there's no complaint either.
> >
> > So, if you maintainers think that the incompatible change
> > now is ok, I'll do (2) above quickly.
> Please go ahead. You should make a note of this change in etc/NEWS as
> well.
Just done.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: fontset/font change, (continued)
Re: fontset/font change, Kenichi Handa, 2009/03/11
- Re: fontset/font change, Miles Bader, 2009/03/11
- Re: fontset/font change, Kenichi Handa, 2009/03/11
- Re: fontset/font change, Miles Bader, 2009/03/12
- Re: fontset/font change, Chong Yidong, 2009/03/12
- Re: fontset/font change, Kenichi Handa, 2009/03/12
- Re: fontset/font change, Chong Yidong, 2009/03/12
- Re: fontset/font change,
Kenichi Handa <=