[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bug#3269: 23.0.93; C-mode text highlighting

From: Alan Mackenzie
Subject: Re: bug#3269: 23.0.93; C-mode text highlighting
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 22:40:21 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

Hi, All!

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:36:05AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> In other words, messed-up highlighting for incorrect code is just as
> >> good if not better than explicitly recognizing the incorrect code and
> >> highlighting it with f-l-warning-face.

> > I was thinking of "compatibility" with unterminated strings in normal
> > code.  But they're not the same thing.  An open string in a #define is
> > perfectly valid code, if somewhat unusual outside of the Obfuscated C
> > competition.

> > You've persuaded me that the existing fontification is actually better.
> > So I won't be committing yesterday's patch.  Thanks!

> I'm glad we ended up agreeing, tho for completely different reasons.

> > I'll just finish the other patch and commit that.


>         Stefan

Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]