[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#3269: 23.0.93; C-mode text highlighting
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: bug#3269: 23.0.93; C-mode text highlighting |
Date: |
Tue, 19 May 2009 22:40:21 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi, All!
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:36:05AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> In other words, messed-up highlighting for incorrect code is just as
> >> good if not better than explicitly recognizing the incorrect code and
> >> highlighting it with f-l-warning-face.
> > I was thinking of "compatibility" with unterminated strings in normal
> > code. But they're not the same thing. An open string in a #define is
> > perfectly valid code, if somewhat unusual outside of the Obfuscated C
> > competition.
> > You've persuaded me that the existing fontification is actually better.
> > So I won't be committing yesterday's patch. Thanks!
> I'm glad we ended up agreeing, tho for completely different reasons.
> > I'll just finish the other patch and commit that.
DONE.
> Stefan
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).