[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: please make line-move-visual nil
From: |
Andrew W. Nosenko |
Subject: |
Re: please make line-move-visual nil |
Date: |
Wed, 27 May 2009 15:51:57 +0300 |
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Andrew W. Nosenko
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Alfred M. Szmidt <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Setting line-move-visual on a
>> per-mode basis is a excellent middle ground that will make ALL parties
>> happy.
>
> Please NO!!!!
>
>
> First at all, after binding additional pair (M-down, M-up) to the
> "phisical" lines motion,
Sorry. Paragraph above ("First at all...") is just artifact,
forgorren to be deleted from the "draft".
>
> In short: "magic" and unpredictable changing of behavior iis very
> inconeinient. At least I found it that.
>
> You can argue that it would not be "magic" or unpredictable, but
> indeed based on a mode or mode-deriviation. But could you predict
> (just as "stupid" user, not as mode's author), what deriviation tree
> has Occur mode, for example? Or Shell Output? (Ok, I know that Shell
> Command Output buffer has Fundamental mode, and what?)
>
> Even for C code it is very useful for me to have visual navigation.
>
> But I understand your point. Moreover, some time ago I also was very
> frustrated, because convinient way for "phisical" line navigation is
> no less. And solution is very simple: just give best from both
> worlds: above in this thread alredy mentioned that AquaEmacs has
> different bindings for C-n/C-p vs. down/up. I also just bound
> "phisical" line movements to the M-down and M-up in addition to the
> "visual" on down and up, and have now conventient and similar bindings
> to the both movement modes. Try it! Just don't throw away only
> because it is unusual for you. Try it first for some time (e.g. 1
> week)!
>
> --
> Andrew W. Nosenko <address@hidden>
>
--
Andrew W. Nosenko <address@hidden>
- RE: please make line-move-visual nil, (continued)
- Re: please make line-move-visual nil, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/05/24
- Re: please make line-move-visual nil, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/05/24
- Re: please make line-move-visual nil, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/05/25
- Re: please make line-move-visual nil, Bastien, 2009/05/25
- Re: please make line-move-visual nil, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/05/25
- RE: please make line-move-visual nil, Drew Adams, 2009/05/25
- Re: please make line-move-visual nil, Andrew W. Nosenko, 2009/05/27
- Re: please make line-move-visual nil,
Andrew W. Nosenko <=
- Re: please make line-move-visual nil, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/05/31
- Re: please make line-move-visual nil, Andreas Schwab, 2009/05/31
- Re: please make line-move-visual nil, Miles Bader, 2009/05/31
- Re: please make line-move-visual nil, Bob Rogers, 2009/05/31
- Re: please make line-move-visual nil, Miles Bader, 2009/05/31
- Re: please make line-move-visual nil, Deniz Dogan, 2009/05/31
- Re: please make line-move-visual nil, Miles Bader, 2009/05/31
- Re: please make line-move-visual nil, Chong Yidong, 2009/05/31
- RE: please make line-move-visual nil, Drew Adams, 2009/05/25
- Re: please make line-move-visual nil, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/05/25