Re: Symbol's function definition is void: <

[Lennart Borgman]

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Andreas
Roehler<address@hidden> wrote:
> Lennart Borgman wrote:
>> I have got a strange bug report for nXhtml. The report says that < is
>> not defined. Please see
>>
>>     http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/NxhtmlMode#toc13
>>
>> What functions could make < void? fset?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Encountering that error from time to time, reason here is regulary:
>
> a crashed beginning-of-buffer command --wrongly typed-- left a "<", which was 
> saved
>  when closing Emacs.
>
> If I start Emacs again, that error is signaled.
>
> So sorry, should I'm be the only stupid one doing such things.
>
> But, earnestly, would expect just this reason for the OP.


Andreas, could you please explain what you did? I do not understand.