|
From: | Davis Herring |
Subject: | Re: Willing to debug bug #3542 (23.0.94; File access via UNC path slow again under Windows) |
Date: | Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:32:18 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: | SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.7.lanl5.newsieve |
> That's not what I meant. What I meant is the problem that could > happen if encoded_dir's value was address@hidden, and there was also a > directory called "foo". Won't we then opendir "foo"? Of course. But is the equivalence between "foo" and "address@hidden" fundamentally worse than the (almost: consider symlinks) equivalence between "foo" and "foo/"? Maybe it just doesn't matter much. > And what if opendir was replaced by unlink? Nothing. You can't unlink directories. ;) Davis -- This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during shipping.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |