[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?
From: |
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu |
Subject: |
Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch? |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Jul 2009 11:35:34 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
>>>>> On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:22:24 -0400, Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
>>>>> said:
> Richard, is it OK with you to keep the following features only
> for a proprietary platform (Cocoa) in the Emacs 23.1 release?
>> 1. Code for stippling. This is wrongly implemented as tiling,
>> which has been controversial whether or not to be included in the
>> other platforms, IIUC.
> An incorrect implementation of stippling is somewhat of a bug, but
> it might be better than no implementation of stippling. Anyway, I
> don't see a reason to object that this is only on MacOS.
>> 2. Code for interpreting incompatible color formats: RGBrrggbb,
>> ARGBaarrggbb, HSVhhssvv, AHSVaahhssvv, and CMYKccmmyykk. Besides
>> the format itself, support for the alpha-component in color is not
>> found in the other platforms but not inherently NS-specific.
> These are minor things, nothing to object to.
They sound like a really important policy change: allowing a
proprietary platform to be the first one to have features that are not
specific to the platform. Are you sure?
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
address@hidden
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, (continued)
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Jason Rumney, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/24
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/24
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/25
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?,
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <=
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Miles Bader, 2009/07/25
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/25
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/26
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/26
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/27
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Clifford Wulfman, 2009/07/27
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/28
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Clifford Wulfman, 2009/07/28
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/28
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/07/28