[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: moving window handling into lisp
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: moving window handling into lisp |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:21:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
> Ok. Could you please then summarize what rules you have thought of
> here? What is it that should be relaxed? What do you want to happen
> then? What problems do you see for different solutions there? (Not the
> algorithms, just the rules, please.)
How can I give you rules if I don't know what kind of rules you expect.
I can only guess, so let's take an example. Suppose I have two windows
w1 and w2 one above the other:
------
| w1 |
|------|
| w2 |
------
When I want to enlarge w1 by one line I suppose I can do something
like
(wa-set-wrmin w1 (1+ (window-height w1)))
(wa-set-wrmax w1 (1+ (window-height w1)))
(wa-set-wrmin w2 (1- (window-height w2)))
(wa-set-wrmax w2 (1- (window-height w2)))
that is start with the tightest possible restriction. Now suppose I
have a third window w3
------
| w1 |
|------|
| w2 |
|------|
| |
| w3 |
| |
------
want to enlarge w1, but w2 has minimum height or is fixed-size (the
latter is an example of a pending bug). In this case I probably first
try the same as before, fail, and then do
(wa-set-wrmin w1 (1+ (window-height w1)))
(wa-set-wrmax w1 (1+ (window-height w1)))
(wa-set-wrmin w3 (1- (window-height w3)))
(wa-set-wrmax w3 (1- (window-height w3)))
------
| w1 |
|------|
| w2 |
|------|
| |
| w3 |
| |
------
If w3 has two subwindows side-by-side as in
-------
| w1 |
|-------|
| w2 |
|-------|
| | |
| w4|w5 |
| | |
-------
I probably have to do
(wa-set-wrmin w1 (1+ (window-height w1)))
(wa-set-wrmax w1 (1+ (window-height w1)))
(wa-set-wrmin w4 (1- (window-height w4)))
(wa-set-wrmax w4 (1- (window-height w4)))
(wa-set-wrmin w5 (1- (window-height w5)))
(wa-set-wrmax w5 (1- (window-height w5)))
Now is that the way your algorithm is supposed to be used?
[...]
> You may have some very good point that I am totally missing. That will
> show probably show up if we consider some more concrete example and
> rules.
Just tell me whether I got it right in my examples above or whether the
"size applying stuff" is something you want to resolve with the help of
another strategy within
(case strategy
('eq-sizes
....
martin
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, (continued)
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/13
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/13
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/13
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/13
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, martin rudalics, 2009/08/13
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/13
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, martin rudalics, 2009/08/13
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/13
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, martin rudalics, 2009/08/14
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/14
- Re: moving window handling into lisp,
martin rudalics <=
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, martin rudalics, 2009/08/12
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/12
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, martin rudalics, 2009/08/13
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/13
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, martin rudalics, 2009/08/13
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/08/13
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, martin rudalics, 2009/08/14
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, Richard Stallman, 2009/08/14
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, martin rudalics, 2009/08/14
- Re: moving window handling into lisp, Richard Stallman, 2009/08/14