[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3 |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:27:04 +0900 |
In article <address@hidden>, Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
> Some CJK charsets are necessary to create the default
> fontset. I think it's possible to avoid loading unnecessary
> charsets for creating the default fontset. I'll work on it.
I've just installed a fix for fontset.el.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, (continued)
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/08/24
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Kenichi Handa, 2009/08/24
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/08/24
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Kenichi Handa, 2009/08/25
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/08/25
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Kenichi Handa, 2009/08/26
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/08/26
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Kenichi Handa, 2009/08/26
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Andreas Schwab, 2009/08/26
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Kenichi Handa, 2009/08/26
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/08/24