[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Language identification
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: Language identification |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Aug 2009 10:21:28 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
> However, you asked "how often do you see files containing programming
> languages without an extension?" The answer is, it's very common, but
> the most common case is Unix command scripts with shebangs, which file
> handles just as well as Emacs does.
I guess the question should be, how often do you see such files that
Emacs can't handle as well as libmagic?
Even in such situations, I think the response should be to improve
Emacs' file handling anyway, since libmagic is not available on all
platforms.
Language identification (was: using libmagic in Emacs), Juri Linkov, 2009/08/27
Re: Language identification, Richard Stallman, 2009/08/28
Re: Language identification, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/08/29
Re: Language identification, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/29
Re: Language identification, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/08/29
Re: Language identification, Richard Stallman, 2009/08/30
Re: Language identification, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/28
Re: Language identification, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/28
Re: Language identification, Richard Stallman, 2009/08/30
Re: Language identification, Richard Stallman, 2009/08/29
Re: Language identification, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/29