[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose? |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:32:03 -0700 |
> > What we need IMO is a way to scan all the *.el files, look for
> > `require', and generate Make dependencies between Lisp files. Then
> > this problem should be gone for good. Any takers?
>
> I just spent part of the last couple of hours thinking over this
> problem too. Other files could be autoloaded during
> compilation, and should be listed as dependencies too.
>
> The byte compiler has rather a lot of information available
> while it's doing its job. Perhaps it could look at the files
> that were loaded as part of the compilation, and generate a
> list of dependencies. The byte compiler code itself, and
> files loaded via loadup.el, would still present a problem;
> a conservative approach would be to always list all
> of them as dependencies, though that would lead to excessive
> rebuilding still.
Dunno if any of this code would help, but you might be able to adapt some of it,
depending on what you're trying to do:
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/LibraryDependencies
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/lib-requires.el
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/elisp-depend.el
- build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Andreas Schwab, 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, joakim, 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Jan D., 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Ken Raeburn, 2009/09/07
- RE: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Ken Raeburn, 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Glenn Morris, 2009/09/07
- RE: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Drew Adams, 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/09/07
- more reliable `make', Glenn Morris, 2009/09/07
- Re: more reliable `make', Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/08
- Re: more reliable `make', Glenn Morris, 2009/09/10
- Re: more reliable `make', Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/10
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, joakim, 2009/09/07