[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist? |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:31:34 -0700 |
Haven't thought about this before, but I wonder if the mode should respect
auto-mode-alist when you create a new buffer? There's no doubt a good reason or
two why we don't do this - just wondering.
E.g. `C-x b foo.el', where there is no existing buffer foo.el. The mode is
Fundamental; should it be Emacs-Lisp instead?
(I realize that a new buffer need not be intended to be saved as a file.)
- new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist?,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist?, Deniz Dogan, 2009/09/22
- RE: new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist?, Drew Adams, 2009/09/22
- Re: new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist?, Kevin Rodgers, 2009/09/23
- RE: new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist?, Drew Adams, 2009/09/23
- Re: new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist?, Juri Linkov, 2009/09/24
- RE: new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist?, Drew Adams, 2009/09/24
- Re: new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/24
- Re: new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist?, Juri Linkov, 2009/09/25