[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: simplifying beginning-of-defun

From: Andreas Roehler
Subject: Re: simplifying beginning-of-defun
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:26:19 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20081227)

> any argument.  So your code wouldn't be acceptable as is since it would
> likely break several packages.


Hi Stefan,

reflecting this question a little bit further:

as expressive settings of `push-mark' are removed, some functions
while rely upon and fail then.

However, `push-mark' is a very basic and considerable
editing command. If a function needs it, it should implement it at place.

Suggest keeping things apart: move functions should
move, not deliver a hair-cut. :)

If more is needed, another function should take over than.

All-at-once essays create complexity and never ending
bugs finally.

So far, think simplifying is worthwhile on the longer run.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]