[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BASE_PURESIZE
|
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
|
Subject: |
Re: BASE_PURESIZE |
|
Date: |
Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:37:19 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> For the record, the extra use of purecopy caused the pure_bytes_used
> value to go up by 52KB on 32-bit Windows, and by 92KB on 64-bit
> GNU/Linux. So it looks like the ratio is actually closer to 9/5 than
> to either the old 10/6 or the new 11/7. Or maybe I'm missing
> something.
It all depends on the ratio of string data vs. lisp object pure storage.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- BASE_PURESIZE, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/10/23
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Andreas Schwab, 2009/10/23
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/10/24
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/10/24
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/10/24
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Stefan Monnier, 2009/10/24
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/10/25
- defcustom standard-value (was: Re: BASE_PURESIZE), Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/10/29
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Chong Yidong, 2009/10/24
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/10/24
Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/10/23
Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/10/23