[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: completions - remove window after use?
From: |
Štěpán Němec |
Subject: |
Re: completions - remove window after use? |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:26:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-27) |
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 03:28:09PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > When showing a *completions* buffer in a new window opened for it (TAB
> > in find-file minibuffer for instance), I wonder why the window doesn't
> > get deleted when completion has finished. For instance, when an
> > existing file is found, the *Completions* buffer is buried, but I see
> > a split frame with the original buffer in the top window and _some
> > other_ buffer in the lower window.
>
> > Shouldn't the window for the completions buffer be removed whenever it
> > has been popped up just for the buffer?
>
> I'd tend to agree, but haven't touched it because my usage is
> clearly atypical.
>
>
> Stefan
>
>
Please do touch it, I don't think the current behaviour makes much (read
any) sense either.
And speaking about *Completions*, would it be possible to fill the
completions column-first, not row-first as it is now? I find it quite
unreasonable, as the display is column-wise, but not so filling, making
it harder to quickly skim through the list.
(my English is not perfect, so in case it is not clear from the above
description:
currently, the completions come like this:
aaaa aaaab
abb abbbb
bbb bccc
ccc dddd
whereas more sensible (because of the column-wise display) IMHO would be:
aaaa bbb
aaaab bccc
abb ccc
abbbb dddd
)
Regards,
Štěpán
- completions - remove window after use?, David Reitter, 2009/11/11
- Re: completions - remove window after use?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/11
- Re: completions - remove window after use?,
Štěpán Němec <=
- Re: completions - remove window after use?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/11
- Vertical completions (was: completions - remove window after use?), Juri Linkov, 2009/11/12
- Re: Vertical completions (was: completions - remove window after use?), Deniz Dogan, 2009/11/12
- Re: Vertical completions, Juri Linkov, 2009/11/17
- Re: Vertical completions, martin rudalics, 2009/11/18
- Re: Vertical completions, Juri Linkov, 2009/11/18
- Backward completions (was: Vertical completions), Juri Linkov, 2009/11/18
- RE: Backward completions (was: Vertical completions), Drew Adams, 2009/11/18
- Re: Backward completions (was: Vertical completions), Lennart Borgman, 2009/11/18
- Re: Backward completions, Juri Linkov, 2009/11/18