[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: relative load-file
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: relative load-file |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:38:22 -0500 |
So what require-relative and load-relative allow one to do is create these
little independent units without the overhead of using a more elaborate
packaging systems.
I do not follow your point. I think I understand what you mean by a
program with subparts. Can you explain why you think
`require-relative' is particularly helpful for that?
That's in fact what I have
done<http://github.com/rocky/emacs-load-relative>.
The only "primitive" needed is Ruby's __FILE__ which is the same thing as
the C preprocessor __FILE__.
Why do you think that making it relative to the location of the loading
file is particularly necessary?
- Re: relative load-file, (continued)
- Re: relative load-file, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/12
- Re: relative load-file, Rocky Bernstein, 2009/11/12
- Re: relative load-file, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/13
- Re: relative load-file, Rocky Bernstein, 2009/11/13
- Re: relative load-file, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/13
- Re: relative load-file, Rocky Bernstein, 2009/11/13
Re: relative load-file, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/14
- Re: relative load-file, Rocky Bernstein, 2009/11/14
- Re: relative load-file,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: relative load-file, Rocky Bernstein, 2009/11/15
- Re: relative load-file, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/18
- Re: relative load-file, Rocky Bernstein, 2009/11/18
- Re: relative load-file, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/21
- Re: relative load-file, Rocky Bernstein, 2009/11/21
- Re: relative load-file, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/22
- Re: relative load-file, Rocky Bernstein, 2009/11/23
- Re: relative load-file, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/24
Re: relative load-file, grischka, 2009/11/13