[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: t and nil in pure memory?

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: t and nil in pure memory?
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:55:31 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux)

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>>     I am skeptical that we have everything in place that is required to
>>     properly support
>>     (unintern nil)
>>     (unintern t)
>> We should make them give errors -- that's much easier than
>> making them "work".  There's no reason they should be allowed.
> Rather I think there's no reason to spend any time either making them
> work or making them signal an error.

Well, you claimed that uninterning them was a concern for having the
obarray links end in pure memory.

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]