[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: t and nil in pure memory?

From: A. Soare
Subject: Re: t and nil in pure memory?
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:28:46 +0100 (CET)

>    7. Re: t and nil in pure memory? (Richard Stallman)
> ------------------------------
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:12:55 -0500
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: t and nil in pure memory?
> To: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
>     As maintainer I care about maintainability of the code.  I will reject
>     such a change.
> 2 lines whose meaning is totally obvious -- not much work to maintain.
> This looks like stubbornness to me.  I have no reason to be stubborn
> about it, so I will move on.

I did run

grep -riI "(put[[:blank:]\n]*t[^a-z]" *   and
grep -riI "(put[[:blank:]\n]*nil" *

in ./lisp directory, and I did find what I expected: nothing.

Could somebody give me an example in which adding properties to `t' and `nil' 
may be useful?


Gagnez un séjour au Maroc en découvrant les sketchs désopilants des ReVoila sur 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]