Re: Strange message from "bzr pull"

[Óscar Fuentes]

Karl Fogel <address@hidden> writes:

>>BzrForEmacsDevs is not simple enough for people who have CVS
>>incorporated into their DNA. IMHO it lacks some clear explanation of
>>the new concepts (revisions, branches, merges, histories, divergence,
>>etc)
>
> Several places in the document (including the The Other Resources
> section) already point to
> http://wiki.bazaar.canonical.com/BzrForCVSUsers, which has the material
> you describe.

That document is too shallow, barely qualifies as an introduction. It
doesn't hint at what a revision, for instance. Nobody that reads that
document knows that the key information that makes DVCS possible is what
you see with

bzr log --show-ids

-- 
Óscar