[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?

From: Lennart Borgman
Subject: Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 00:48:25 +0100

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Jason Earl <address@hidden> wrote:
> Lennart Borgman <address@hidden> writes:
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> From: Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
>>>> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:37:15 +0100
>>>> Cc: address@hidden
>>>> Just a comment: I have not even tried yet to use bzr. According to
>>>> what I am reading it looks impossible at the moment.
>>>> Am I right or?
>>> It's both possible and practical.  I use it on 2 different Windows
>>> machines and on 1 GNU/Linux one, and it works quite well.  The initial
>>> "bzr branch" takes a long time, but that's all.
>> And with a 2Mbit/s connection and an Alan style pc, 1GB RAM?
> I use it with a netbook with 1GB of Ram and no swap.  It works fine.  I
> will admit that I have switched to pulling from launchpad, but I did my
> initial pull from Savannah.

How long did the initial pull take on this machine? (Sorry if you have
told already. Are the figures perhaps on the wiki?) How fast is your

And doing the initial pull from Launchpad instead how much faster is it?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]