[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:36:43 +0100
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Juri Linkov <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> multi-occur-in-matching-buffers said to me that it wanted a place in
>>>> the menus (and since this does not seem to be regarded a feature at
>>>> all that it can't be to late).
>>> Did it say to you where it wants to be placed in the menu?
>>> In the same submenu with `occur'?
>> Yes, it is very fond of occur.
> But where does occur want to be? In the same place with grep?
Yes, but remember that occur is married to query-replace. She will
feel quite lonely and useless without him. I think they all feel they
are a big family.
And I know they have a couple of friends that perhaps want to move in
>>>> It also wanted a bit better argument guessing.
>>> Does it want a better default like a buffer name in `multi-occur'?
>> It asked if it is too much to hope for ".*\.el". Eh, no wait,
>> (concat ".*" (file-name-extension (buffer-file-name)).
> I see, this is like rgrep using grep-read-files.
Yes, that is how I feel too.
> Juri Linkov