[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NEVER use `bzr push' for sending changes upstream
From: |
Mark A. Hershberger |
Subject: |
Re: NEVER use `bzr push' for sending changes upstream |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:29:26 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) |
Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden> writes:
>> (Btw, address@hidden bounces.)
I'll fix that. “bzr whoami” to the rescue.
> Mark did "merge & push" twice, so it is very likely that that is his
> usual workflow. It is *very* damaging for the VC history.
Appologies. I'll make any changes suggested in this thread. I didn't
intend to commit twice. I got confused by the second conflict.
--
http://hexmode.com/
The only alternative to Tradition is bad tradition.
— Jaraslov Pelikan
Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25