[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: merge conlict?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: merge conlict? |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:10:40 +0200 |
> From: Karl Fogel <address@hidden>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:42:51 -0500
>
> Lennart Borgman <address@hidden> writes:
> >This thread is over my head, I do not have time to capture the
> >details. Could the conclusions from the discussion (when it is
> >somewhat ready) please be put on the EmacsWiki page?
>
> It's too long for me too.
>
> But since some people may be expecting me to maintain BzrForEmacsDevs,
> this is an explicit request for someone who understands what the heck
> has been concluded here to please update the page if necessary!
There's nothing to update. Everything is already there. The problem
which started this was because the guilty parties didn't follow the
workflow described on the wiki to the letter.
- Re: merge conlict?, (continued)
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Richard Stallman, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Richard Stallman, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Karl Fogel, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: merge conlict?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Richard Stallman, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
Re: merge conlict?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/25