[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bidi branch

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: bidi branch
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:03:55 +0200

> From: James Cloos <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:16:42 -0500
> >>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> EZ> I'm still unclear why it makes more sense to have a public branch
> EZ> than to merge with the trunk.
> Just to get it out there before the merge.
> I we cannot convince you to let us see it and test it out now, I
> suppose there is no reason. :(

IMO, it doesn't make sense to publish code that wasn't yet made to
compile on anything but GNU/Windows (i.e., the Windows build will be
broken), and which I never tried to run in a GUI session.  Why would
anyone want to see such code so badly?

I hope to get past those two obstacles in about 4 weeks, and then I'll
be ready to go public.  The merge itself is a non-issue, since I'm
resyncing with the trunk every week.  Stefan and Yidong agreed to this

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]