[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bidi branch
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: bidi branch |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:10:37 +0900 |
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> IMO, it doesn't make sense to publish code that wasn't yet made to
> compile on anything but GNU/Windows (i.e., the Windows build will be
> broken), and which I never tried to run in a GUI session. Why would
> anyone want to see such code so badly?
Because they've got lots of time on their hands.
Of course it's up to you, but there are a *lot* of very skilled
hackers around here, and anybody who's abused their retinas with UAX
#9 knows there is not much short of a full-blown operating system that
has the hack value of a bidi algorithm!
:-)
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, (continued)
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/11
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/11
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/11
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Andreas Schwab, 2010/03/11
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, James Cloos, 2010/03/11
- Re: bidi branch (was: Emacs-23 release branch), Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/12
- Re: bidi branch, James Cloos, 2010/03/13
- Re: bidi branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/13
- Re: bidi branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/13
- RE: bidi branch, Drew Adams, 2010/03/13
- Re: bidi branch,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/11
- Re: bidi branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/12
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Andreas Schwab, 2010/03/12
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/12
Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Michael Albinus, 2010/03/10
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/10
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Michael Albinus, 2010/03/10
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/11
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Michael Albinus, 2010/03/11
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/11