Re: Image metadata

[Stefan Monnier]

> The problem is that one part of the current `image-extension-data'
> is metadata, and another part is extension data.  For instance, in

>   (count 44
>    255 "NETSCAPE2.0"
>      0 "address@hidden@"
>    249 "address@hidden"
>   )

> `count 44' is metadata, and the rest (with non-descriptive numeric keys)
> is extension data.

Not knowing what is "extension data", I don't know if I agree.


        Stefan