[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: which-function => DEFUN?
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: which-function => DEFUN? |
Date: |
Mon, 10 May 2010 19:30:38 +0200 |
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 17:56, Lennart Borgman
<address@hidden> wrote:
> We might have stepped into the next function.
In the case of DEFUN, which is only used in the Emacs sources, that's
unlikely unless you have
DEFUN (...)
{
}DEFUN (...)
which I don't think happens even once in the source (I doesn't, I just checked).
> Efficiency.
I have never noticed any slowness, but YMMV.
> And actually readability.
Let's agree to disagree on this one.
Juanma
- which-function => DEFUN?, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/10
- Re: which-function => DEFUN?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/05/10
- Re: which-function => DEFUN?, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/05/10
- Global match data considered harmful, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/05/10
- Re: Global match data considered harmful, Stefan Monnier, 2010/05/11
- Re: Global match data considered harmful, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/05/11
- Re: Global match data considered harmful, tomas, 2010/05/12