[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hl-line and visual-line
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Hl-line and visual-line |
Date: |
Sat, 22 May 2010 00:31:40 +0200 |
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Stefan Monnier
<address@hidden> wrote:
>> Could we please make the change to have overlays with negative
>> priority below text? I have asked for this several times. What is
>> holding it back?
>
> Lack of patch?
Didn't I send something for that long ago? I am not sure anymore.
I am not even sure I understand the code. Is it just a simple change
in face_at_buffer_position in xfaces.c that is needed? Faces are
merged there and merging the faces for overlays with negative
priorities first seems to be what is needed.
However to do that I need Qpriority in xfaces.c. It is however defined
in buffer.c. How should that be handled?
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, (continued)
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/05/24
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Stefan Monnier, 2010/05/24
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/24
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/05/24
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/24
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, David Reitter, 2010/05/24
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/24
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/21
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/05/21
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Stefan Monnier, 2010/05/21
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Stefan Monnier, 2010/05/21
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/21
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/22
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/22
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/05/21