Re: Hl-line and visual-line

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 21:06:11 +0200
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, David Reitter <address@hidden>, 
> address@hidden
> 
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Stefan Monnier
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> IOW, we need to introduce a new subroutine (that would produce such a
> >> list), not change beginning/end-of-visual-line.  Do you agree?
> >
> > Yes.
> 
> 
> Could we please have `point-at-bovl' and `point-at-eovl' (or the
> longer versions `visual-line-beginning-position' etc)?

I think you have them already: you these are beginning-of-visual-line
and end-of-visual-line.  If these don't fit the bill, please tell what
is your definition of `bovl' and `eovl'.