[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concerning the new `ido-use-virtual-buffers' feature
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Concerning the new `ido-use-virtual-buffers' feature |
Date: |
Fri, 28 May 2010 12:35:01 +0200 |
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:07, Leo <address@hidden> wrote:
> The only bit that I am unsure is the deleted lines in the following
> hunk. i.e. if method is 'kill disregard virtual buffers. Seems like
> someone wants to work around a bug. But I don't know what it is so I
> didn't implement a similar logic in the added lines.
That was me.
I doesn't help to show a list of nonexistent buffers when you want to
kill an existent one, does it? The only way that would make sense is
if killing a virtual buffer removed it from the list for good.
Juanma
- Re: Concerning the new `ido-use-virtual-buffers' feature, (continued)
- Re: Concerning the new `ido-use-virtual-buffers' feature, Leo, 2010/05/27
- Re: Concerning the new `ido-use-virtual-buffers' feature, Tassilo Horn, 2010/05/27
- Re: Concerning the new `ido-use-virtual-buffers' feature, Leo, 2010/05/27
- Re: Concerning the new `ido-use-virtual-buffers' feature, Tassilo Horn, 2010/05/27
- Re: Concerning the new `ido-use-virtual-buffers' feature, Leo, 2010/05/27
- Re: Concerning the new `ido-use-virtual-buffers' feature, Leo, 2010/05/27
- Re: Concerning the new `ido-use-virtual-buffers' feature, Tassilo Horn, 2010/05/28
- Re: Concerning the new `ido-use-virtual-buffers' feature, Leo, 2010/05/28
- Re: Concerning the new `ido-use-virtual-buffers' feature, Leo, 2010/05/28
- Re: Concerning the new `ido-use-virtual-buffers' feature,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Concerning the new `ido-use-virtual-buffers' feature, Leo, 2010/05/28
- Re: Concerning the new `ido-use-virtual-buffers' feature, Tassilo Horn, 2010/05/28
- Re: Concerning the new `ido-use-virtual-buffers' feature, Leo, 2010/05/29