[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lines again
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Lines again |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:04:27 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> I think "screen lines" and "visual lines" should be the same, yes.
>> "continuation lines" refer specifically to screen lines that are
>> created because of wrapping (i.e. are not displayed on the same
>> visual line as the beginning of the logical line).
> I am thinking differently.
I just explained the way those terms are used, and from what you go on
writing, you don't seem to disagree.
[...]
> So, I am proposing that you get rid of the `line-move-visual' as a
> user option and revert C-n and C-p to act in the logical/visual manner
> in their appropriate modes. You will make a lot of long-time Emacs
> users a lot happier.
Ah, so that's what it's about. Then thanks for your input, but we've
been through that discussion too many times already. Yes, it's
inconsistent, yes, it's a compromise, no not everybody likes it.
Then (setq line-move-visual nil) in your .emacs and live happily
ever after.
WRT to keyboard macros, yes it's a source of problems, but I think the
solution should go further than just tweaking line-move-visual.
Stefan
PS: Interestingly, Emacs-2[12] already did a form of line-move-visual,
just that their code was doing it in a too naive way which only tried to
pay attention to images and invisible text).